DEPARTMENTS


Sex and Other
Mindfucks


Drugs and
Rock 'n' Roll


Media and
Mediocrity


Society (and
Antisocial
Tendencies)


Politics and Other
Bullshit

Inhuman
Resources


Casual Fridays


Miscellaneous
Editorial
Rantings and
Ravings

In and Out:
Sex Advice from our Staff Dominatrix


Employee of the
Month



ABOUT US

Mission
Statement


Who We Are


Write for Us!

Invest in Anti-
Commercialism!

Play Our Theme Song
by Simon Inns
(MP3 format; 1.5 MB download)

Donate to the Cause!



John Zerzan's Running on Emptiness
 
   
 

 

An Introduction to Anarcho-Primitivism


 

by Ken Mondschein

 

 

Running on Emptiness
by John Zerzan
Feral House / 2002 / $12

The Web is, at the same time, both the best and worst medium to write about John Zerzan's work—for the Internet, like Zerzan's thinking itself, is based on symbols.

Symbols control everything you are seeing now on your screen. Meaning-laden electronic impulses stream over fiber-optic cables from my server to your computer. The machine knows to display the letters of the alphabet, which form signs called words, because it interprets these impulses as a set of symbols called "ASCII" and "hypertext markup language." The words themselves are each meaningless on its own, but, given definitions by their relationships to the other words of the English language and placed side by side in the correct order, they trigger the neurons in your brain, releasing a flood of memories and associations. Even the physical body of the computer itself carries a logo such as "Intel Inside," a symbol for the company that made it—and a corporation could not exist without being able to control symbols such as time and money.

It was somewhat appropriate that I was introduced to Zerzan's Running on Emptiness on an airplane heading East over the North Atlantic. Traveling to strange lands, where the language and thus the symbols are different, has a way of shaking one loose from one's usual way of thinking. Moreover, the purpose of my journey was richly symbolic: I was attending a convocation of traditional fencing masters, who pass on the signs and knowledge from the past to the future (in this case, those relating to using swords).

Zerzan's arguments are as compelling as they are radical. Originally, he writes, there were no signs. People lived without symbols, in a Zen-like mindfulness, existing in the eternal present. As "primitive" hunter-gatherers, we existed in a state of equality, mutual cooperation, and harmony with nature. Then came agriculture and civilization, and inevitably, some people became haves, and other became have-nots. To justify this power imbalance, religion—the art of inventing and manipulating symbols—was invented. All symbols, Zerzan argues, come ultimately from religion, and they all exist to exert power and justify imbalances: God loves me more, so I get all the stuff. There can be no civilization without a priesthood.

Moreover, Zerzan believes that civilization is a malignant virus, seeking to fill any vacuum it might find by means of the techniques of religion and capitalism—and, like a fever, it will burn itself out. His solution to the problem is anarcho-primitivism, an apocalyptic hoping for the end of civilization and return to a state of natural grace, when people will live in small groups without any organized government. While Zerzan's millennialist vision may owe as much to his despised Book of Revelations as it does to anthropology, his writing has also been enormously influential: Some groups, such as Black Bloc anarchists, see his writings almost as religious texts. It is also easy to critique Zerzan's Romantic conception of early people as noble savages: Mass extinctions followed the first Paleolithic incursions into North America, millennia before any evidence of agriculture, and many scientists have argued convincingly that differentiation in sex roles, has a biological, not a cultural, basis. Even chimpanzees have their dominance hierarchies and restrict each other's access to valuable resources, such as mates.

Still, though Zerzan may not deal fully with the scientific record, many of his ideas, particularly about power and its techniques, are utterly compelling. If anything, the value of his work is that he articulates the fact that, as our society has grown more complex, the ways in which we subjugate each other to our own will have also grown more artful—and being subjugated isn't much fun. In order to live happy lives, we will need to redefine how we relate to power and to one another. As such, it is highly recommended to all our fellow corporate motherfuckers out there.

(Click here to order Running on Emptiness from the Feral House Web site.)

 

All Luddites should e-mail editor@corporatemofo.com



Posted April 29, 2003 12:09 AM

 


 

Backtalk




 

 

Copyright 2001-2010
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33
Logo design by Molitorious